Monday, October 13, 2014

Human Variation

     In California, there's no doubt that it is going to be hot. Deserts and inland areas are hotter than most beach cities along the coast. Everyone enjoys the heat every once in awhile because it's nice to get away from the cold after winter. Although many people can enjoy the heat, when it is that it is TOO hot? Around 75 degrees seems to me to be the perfect temperature, when you can feel the sun's rays beating down on you and yet it's not scorching hot. If it's in the 100's, then it is way too hot even if there's a cold pool nearby because no matter what you do, you will be sweating without a doubt. Heat has a huge impact on people. Many don't see it or notice it but it does. Think of it this way, if you are really hot and you are just sitting down watching tv while sweating, don't you feel uncomfortable? I would. The heat tends to dehydrate people quickly which is the reason why we all need to drink a lot of water every day during spring and summer mostly. Being dehydrated can lead to death because of the lack of water being consumed. The heat affects the way we live also. Heat waves are the worst and it can cause many issues within people. Heat stroke is a severe example as to why the heat can be a problem because it needs medical attention immediately. Symptoms of this are a body temperature of 103 or higher and unconsciousness. There are approximately 688 deaths a year from heat waves within the U.S. If a person is too hot, they will not want to do anything which can cause them to just sit there and not move. These types of people need to be given water and possibly a water bottle to be spritzed with.
      An example of a short-term adaptation can be swimming. On a hot day, it's nice to take a dip in the pool to cool off. However, the water might not be cold, it just depends on how hot the weather is. Submerging yourself in water is the best possible way to adapting to this stress because it doesn't just cool one part of your body off but your whole body.
      An example of a facultative adaptation may be fainting. It allows the body to relax and enables oxygen flow throughout our bodies. Fainting can help stabilize the energy level and cool the body off.



      An example of a developmental adaptation can be our bodies. Having less fat means less cells throughout our skin which is less body that the sun sees. The thinner our bodies the less hot we seem to be.

      An example of a cultural adaptation is tank top, shorts, and flip flops. This allows us to have less clothing on too stay cool. If we were to be wearing long sleeves on a hot day, everyone would have sweating arm pits and possibly get dehydrated.


      It is a great learning experience when talking about these stresses especially heat. It gives everyone an eye opener of how serious it is when it's really hot outside. It gives us examples on how to cool our bodies off and keep healthy. Nobody wants to faint and I'm sure nobody likes sweating. Even during the cold weather, we all need to know how to survive through these types of environmental experiences. Blankets, jackets, and gloves to shorts, flip flops, and a pool is what keeps us all warm and cool.
      You cannot determine the way humans react to different environmental stress by race. Everyone is different. Seeing that someone has darker skin does not mean they experience the stresses differently. Different body shapes are another thing why we can't use race as to determine these experiences. All over the world, there are different ways people handle the weather conditions and stresses within their community. It does not necessarily mean they are a different race, it's just the environment they live in.


 

Monday, October 6, 2014

Language Post

NO verbal/written/sign language
      After taking part of a 15 minute conversation where I was not able to communicate with them through speaking, sign language, or written words, I realized how difficult it was to “communicate” with the two people. To me it was kind of like charades, however, it was much harder because it was an actual conversation and not just acting out a specific action. I don't know any sign language except spelling my name so that was easy to not use that form of communication. Without using any sign language, written words, or verbal speaking, it made me noticed how important those are to us.
      My partners were confused on what was going on and they kept telling me to speak because they had no clue what I was doing, although, they did catch on and were able to understand some things here and there. They did not necessarily alter the way they were communicating with me, they just slowed down and took their time to try and understand what I was doing. They had a confused look on their face the whole time but they caught on by the time the 15 minutes were up.
      If both my partners and I came from different cultures, it would have been even more difficult trying to talk to them through just hand motions, not even sign language where movements actually represent something. I feel not all cultures use sign language or use hand motions as much as me. I use hand motions even when I'm just talking normal because it puts emphasis on what I'm trying to explain. I feel like the speaking culture has the advantage because they can use emotion and symbols with the hands compared to the culture that doesn't have symbolic language. The speaking culture could be getting annoyed how the other culture isn't understanding what they are saying. It would be extremely difficult for other languages to comprehend what we are saying because we are used to the way we communicate, unlike them. In our culture, there are people who have lost their hearing and are deaf. I had a boy in my class last semester in English who had to have a person with him every class in order to tell him what his teacher is saying. The interpreter used sign language to communicate with the boy in order for him to know what to do. Obviously he was able to read, so if a paper was handed out, he could understand that, however, if he was confused, it's not like he could walk up to the teacher and ask what to do. The interpreter was a huge help and I give her props because I want to learn sign language and after watching her do all the symbols was interesting.

Verbal Communication ONLY
      This was also a difficult task to complete. I tried my best to use only one tone of voice. The tone of voice can be a dead give away of the information being said. It uses a lot of emotion because if you're mad, you would obviously yell, if you were sad, you would cry. Raising your voice is the beginning of noticing someone's mad when talking to you. No symbols or sign language made it difficult to put emphasis on what is being said. I use hand motions in general so it was really hard for me. One tone of voice is so boring to talk in, in my opinion. It makes people a boring person and it is something that I do not choose to do again. Haha.
      In this part of the experiment, my partners were like “okay what is going on with you now? Have a heart, show some emotion!” I did not warn them what I was going to do, I just kind of joined their conversation uninvited. It was just my mom and my dad so no big deal. My parents were affected as much as the first part of this assignment because I was able to use verbal language. I can tell them stuff but I was just a boring person talking, that's all that was different then talking normal.
      Our signs in our language is very important and we just don't know it. Symbols are used in every day life and no one notices it because they don't think they are portraying symbols in any way. Hand motions are an example of symbols. We all use them but we don't think we're moving our hands when we're talking.
      Children, I feel have a difficulty of reading body language and the elderly also. I work with children so I can definitely see them not understanding the body language I use when talking to them. I will try to not saying anything and use my arms and hands to tell a child something if it's too loud in the room. Most of the time they just yell “WHAT?” At that point, I will call them over to me and explain what I was saying. When it comes to the elderly, I can see this also because my grandpa lives with us. He is only 62 years old, however, he has Alzheimer’s. I will joke with him a lot and he will joke back, but a lot of them time he won't understand what I am doing or saying to him. He will also just like the kids say “what?” but he won't yell it like them. It's sad because my grandpa will probably never again be able to talk to use like he did when I was little, but when it comes to the children at work, they will grow up to learn the different ways people communicate using body language.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

Piltdown Man Hoax

       The Piltdown man fossils were dug up in a hug pit of gravel in England in 1919 by Charles Dawson. Once this piece of a human skull was found, Dawson decided to call in two others to help with the search for more pieces, Author Smith Woodward and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. When the Piltdown fossils were first discovered, scientists believe that those fossils were the missing link between humans and apes. Although, this one piece did not stop the search for the connection of apes and humans, it only motivated them in search for more to possible complete a whole skull. The three men found more fossils that look to be a Paleolithic ancestor. England were so ecstatic to hear that they had found ancient human fossils. With the fossils being discovered, Author Keith, who was England's leading anatomist, was able to have evidence of his theory of evolution. Keith was on board with the Piltdown man because it provided him with actual fossils for his theory. People remained on the hunt for more fossils for the Piltdown man and they did continue to find more, however, once Dawson had passed away, there were no more fossils to be found. Hence, the reason for the Piltdown man to be proven fake.  

       All humans have faults which is why we are not perfect. We all make mistakes and yet we just learn to forgive and forget the mistakes in which we have made. There are some faults that come in to play in this scenario. For example, pride and jealousy are two important faults. Charles Dawson was so proud of himself because of the findings he had discovered. Dawson was so excited to finally have be recognized by the scientific community. Although, jealousy comes into play also once people found out about these discoveries Dawson had made. England scientists could possibly be jealous because they wish they had the ability to find the dated discoveries other countries had been making. Dawson's discovery had an impact on the scientific community and Dawson could be finally accepted by other scientists. These fossils were able to show other countries that England is actually able to dig up findings that are important and interesting to see.

        Scientific testing was done and had lead to the conclusion of the Piltdown man hoax. There were stainings on the bones that were appearing after the fluorine analysis that was going on in Piltdown in 1949. The fluorine analysis allowed scientists to date how old these fossils were. The teeth on the part of the jawline that were present seemed to have been filed down in order for them to look more human. Going back to the staining, they had found a person down the road who could have been another suspect for the hoax of the Piltdown man. He could have been the one behind all of it because in possess were tools that had the same exact staining the fossil had. Everything about this fossil seemed to have been from an ape, and yet someone filed down and stained it to look more human like in order to trick everyone that this fossil was a fossil of a common ancestor between humans and apes.

        I do not believe someone can remove all the human factor from science. Humans are who discover all the findings and scientists do all the calculations in order to date how old a fossil is. Although, sometimes humans do make mistakes, just like stated previously, which is why human have an impact of new discoveries just like with the Piltdown man hoax. If a human was to not mess with this fossil found and not file down any teeth or stain it, I feel the Piltdown man would not be considered a hoax. It was because of this human contact that proved it to be fake. Many believed that this was the connection between humans and apes, however, one human fooled the whole world coming to the conclusion after many testing that the Piltdown man was not real.
       The lesson I have learned after the Piltdown man hoax was that I need to be careful of what people say. Not everything I hear is true. Many people like to twist true information and make it seem completely different then how it actually was said. There is a little truth to every lie. It also could be like the game telephone because if someone hears a statement incorrectly, it could change the way the information is portrayed to another person. I will now learn to no believe everything I hear, and if I were to hear something crazy, I will definitely either do some research or go the actual source from which this information came from.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Body Size and Sexual Dimorphism

Lemurs
a.) These primates live in Madagascar Islands or Comoro Islands which is on the Southeast coast of Africa and have evolved with the ability to live in an extreme seasonal environment. Lemurs deal with disgustingly dry weather all the way to drenching wet weather. They are called arboreal which is why they live in trees, but there are also some that live on the ground too. During the rainy seasons, most Lemurs live in the rain forest because there are more food there but will leave once the seasons over. These primates will adapt easily to any environment they're given.
b.) Lemurs vary on body size, depending on the type of Lemurs you are looking at, however, in general they're very small in size. Their length is between 90 centimeters and 110 centimeters. They have long pointy noses that allows them to smell which is what they depend heavily on. They rely on their balance skills. They vary on weight from 1.1 ounces to about 20 pounds. Compared to an anthropoid primate, their brain to body size ratio is smaller. It's the same for male and female lemurs, not much of a difference in size regardless of their gender, although their colors are different. Lemurs lack sexual dimorphism, however, they show sexual dichromatism, which is when males and females of the same species show different patterns and color fur. Males posses black/dark chocolate fur while females are lighter brown/chestnut color.
c.) The lemurs are relatively small and have mess body mass then most primates. When in the rain forest, jumping from tree to tree, they have the ability to throw themselves a lot further then most primates larger then them. Lemurs weigh less and since they're smaller, they're able to hide up in trees from their predators easily. Their body size is huge advantage in their habitat because it enables them to either be on the ground or up in the trees. Most of them live in trees, however, larger Lemurs supposedly live on the ground.
Spider Monkeys
a.) Spider monkeys are found in the tropical rainforests of Central and South America and can be found all the way north to Mexico but some species are also found in Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia. They live in trees just like Lemurs do but prefer undisturbed evergreen rainforests and the upper canopies. They very rarely come down to ground level. Because they live pretty much in the upper canopy, they are pretty well adapted to their environment in the treetops and are fairly strong. They are considered the acrobats of New World primates.
b.) These primates have very little sexual dimorphism as well. Males (about 24 pounds) tend to be slightly larger then females (about 21 pound). Their length is about 35 centimeters including their tails. Males are more dominant than females, however, I have read that females are the ones who scare predators away.
c.) The spider monkeys characteristics allows them to adapt to their lifestyle quite well. Their long arms allows them to swing from tree to tree, using the hand over hand method called brachiation. Their hook type hands gives them the ability to grip the branches and swing right off of them to the next one and their tails are strong enough to hold their whole bodies. These prehensile tails allows them to move throughout the rainforest with security and ease.

Baboon
a.) These primates live in the grassland of Africa, the savannas, woodlands and some live in the tropical rainforest and baboons are very adaptable for any environment they live in. They mostly live in tall trees or cliff faces. They can survive a long time without water because at night, they can lick the dew around them to give them the refreshing water.
b.) Smaller, thinner, and lighter baboons live in the coastal and southern Kenya while darker and more heavy ones live in western and central Kenya. No matter the size, both are considered “dogfaced”. They range from 50 to 100 pounds and are 14 centimeters to 30 centimeters at the shoulder. These primates are one of the largest primates. They are sexual dimorphic mainly in size because the males are nearly twice as big as females. Although, color is sometimes another sexual dimorphism. Males are usually a white and silver color with red or tan around their face while females are mainly just brown in color.
c.) Because Baboons are one of the largest primates, their body size allows them fight off predators well. They're still able to move quickly and they live in the open grasslands of Africa enabling them to see far in the distance in case there are predators near. Males have a bigger body than females so they can compete for mating partners when given the opportunity.


Gibbon
a.) Gibbons live in the evergreen tropical rainforest of southeast Asia and scattered in the forests of China, Burma, Philippines, and Malaysia. They also live in the upper branches of trees and swing from tree to tree. These primates rarely are on the ground and when they walk, whether it be on the branches or on the trees, they will put their arms over their heads to balance them.
b.) Because of their body size, they are considered the lesser of the apes and are relatively smaller then most apes. They have an average of 3 feet in height and weigh around 17 and 26 pounds and their fur color could range from cream/brown to black. These primates also show very little sexual dimorphism. Males and females are around the same size, however, their coloring of the skin and fur is what can be determined male or female. Males are mainly black while females are more of a golden color. This seems to be the way most of these primates can tell between males and females.
c.) Gibbons have long arms enabling them to swing from tree to tree. They also have hook hands and when they're in locomotion, they can move at around 35 miles an hour and flying through gaps of 50 feet just in one leap. Their light weight bodies and long arms is what allows them to fly through the rainforest so quickly. Since they are rarely on the ground, they mainly stay in the treetops which helps them stay away from predators. Their little bodies is an advantage of them hiding in the branches.
Chimpanzee
a.) These great apes only can be found in Africa starting from the west coast of the continent to as far east as Tanzania. They also live in the tropical rainforests, although this place used to be the equatorial forest belt of Africa. These apes are very adaptable to any given environment they live in. Some can adapt to open woodlands, open savannahs, and swamp forests. Whichever habitat they adapted to will determine their behavior. Chimps rarely venture away from forests because they spend most of their time in the trees where the eat, sleep, and socialize. They do not stay high in the trees, but are in the mid to lower tree levels including the ground.
b.) There's a difference between the males and females in these primates because males are usually around 75 to 150 pounds with a height between 3 to 4 feet while females weigh around 50 to 100 pounds with a height of 2 to 3 feet. In regards to the color, males and females have the same black hair all over their bodies, with white beards, pale faces and prominent ears.
c.) Because their bodies are bigger then most, they are able to fight off predators heading in their direction and have long arms to enable them to travel between trees. Their body weight, however, is what makes them not able to live in the treetops of the rainforest like the some of the other primates. They have bigger hands allowing them to grip the trees when traveling on the branches.


The environment has a huge influence on the way these primates live. All of their long arms allow them to swing throughout the rainforests and trees. Their body size depends on the habitat that their living in too. Because chimpanzees and baboons have bigger bodies, some often live on the ground while the other primates like lemurs, spider monkeys, and gibbon are able to live in the trees because of their light body weight. Chimps and baboons have to fight off more predators when on the ground which is why they have bigger bodies, in contrast to the other primates and their smaller bodies.

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Homologus vs Analogous Traits

Homologus Traits
      1. A: The two species I have chosen to have homologus traits were kangaroos and koalas. The homologus trait that they share are the pouches on the their stomach in which they use to carry their babies in for further development beyond the womb.
        B: The pouch is the obvious similarity between the two species. However, the pouch's structure is set up differently for each species. For the koala, the pouch opens backwards and down while the kangaroo's pouch opens in front of the body horizontally. The pouches have developed differently according to each species environment. For example, the kangaroo's pouch would not work right for the koala because koalas climb trees and the way it has developed would make the offspring fall out easily. Same with the koala's pouch, with the way it's developed would make the offspring fall out easily if kangaroo's had this type of pouch when they go hopping along.
        C: The common ancestor of these two species is Hypsiprymnodon bartholomaii which is considered a musky rat-kangaroo. These ancestors had these pouches and have evolved over time because of the competition with placental mammals.
        D:

Analogous Traits

      1. A: The two species I have chosen to have analogous traits were dolphins and sharks. Dolphins and sharks both live in the ocean and they definitely look like each other and it's very hard to tell them apart sometimes if you saw one swimming out in the ocean from shore. They both live in the ocean but have several analogous traits.
        B: Sharks and dolphins have many similarities that are analogies. For example, body shape, flippers, dorsal fins and their side fins. Their flippers help each species to move in a forward motion while their fins help the species turn and stop when they want. When it comes to the dorsal fin, they obviously both have one which we see when they're swimming in the water. These fins are necessary for marine animals because it gives them stability when swimming in the water. Each of these analogous traits have evolved independently because they are far from each others branches on the “tree”. Both of the these species experience environmental pressures that allowed them to adapt in order to survive.
        C: If we go far back in time, I definitely feel their common ancestor could have possessed these analogous traits. Sharks have been around for many many years and have evolved from fish while dolphins are newly evolved but have evolved from land-mammals who have “returned to the water”. Fish and mammals are nothing alike if you hear their names so how could sharks who are related to fish have a common ancestor with dolphins who are closely related to elephants and other mammals? If we go back far enough in time, we could possibly find an ancestor who has possessed these analogous traits, but for now it remains unknown. 
        D: 

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

DNA Code

T A G T T A C A C A G T T A T T T A C T G C C G A A C G C G C T A A C G A T C G T C

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Charles Darwin's Natural Selection

In my opinion, Thomas Malthus is most likely the one to have had the most influential impact on Charles Darwin's natural selection in a positive way. Malthus did not necessarily have an interest in species change, however, had an eye for the limits to human population growth. Malthus had written An Essay on the Principle of Population, which had caught Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace's eye. Even though Darwin and Wallace had discovered natural selection separately, Malthus' ideas inspired both of them. With Malthus' principles in his head, Darwin decided to take them further and applied the principles to not only humans, but to all organisms. Because Malthus was interested in the way human population was growing, the limited resources humans had effected the way the population was growing. This had an impact on Thomas Malthus' way of reading into the way humans live. The resources that are available to survive are obviously limited, which means there are organisms competing to survive. If some organisms do not get the resources they need, they will sadly die because they have not fulfilled their basic needs. And in order to survive, according to Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, an individual, or organism, needs to satisfy their basic needs of food and water. For natural selection to occur, there needs to be competition or else this world would be way over populated with all living organisms because no one would die. Some organisms are more “fit” for the battle of resources, which means they are more likely to survive over others. Finally once the basic needs are met, the organisms can now start to reproduce. These survival traits can be passed down to their off springs, enabling them to survive in the future. I feel like Darwin would not have been able to develop the theory of natural selection without Thomas Malthus' ideas. Charles Darwin would not have known to create the ideas Malthus had come up with. Darwin had the opportunity to take what he had been inspired with and apply it to something he had an interest in. The way species changes were happening were anti-Christian because it gave off a different way Christians had known the evolution theory was. They were not following the Christian expectations of how evolution was. In my opinion, it did not really affect Charles Darwin because he has no interest in religion so why should he follow the way Christians view evolution.


http://evolution.about.com/od/Darwin/tp/People-Who-Influenced-Charles-Darwin.htm